2004 Ford E-350 vs. 1998 Volvo C70
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1998 Volvo C70. (190 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1998 Volvo C70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1063 kg more than 1998 Volvo C70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Volvo C70. (270 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 1998 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | E-350 | C70 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 270 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.1 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 68 L |