2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2000 Audi TT
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2000 Audi TT. (170 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1208 kg more than 2000 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi TT. (235 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 2000 Audi TT | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | E-350 | TT |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 235 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.1 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 86.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 55 L |