2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2000 Ford Puma
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Puma would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 2000 Ford Puma. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1478 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 350 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Puma. (125 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 2000 Ford Puma | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | E-350 | Puma |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1387 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 125 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.1 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 76.5 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 42 L |