2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2000 Mazda 626
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 2000 Mazda 626. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1277 kg more than 2000 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 323 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mazda 626. (152 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 2000 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-350 | 626 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 152 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2422 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2620 mm |