2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2000 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 2000 Mazda Tribute. (129 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1063 kg more than 2000 Mazda Tribute. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 294 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mazda Tribute. (181 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 2000 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-350 | Tribute |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 181 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.1 mm | 84.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 50 L |