2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2001 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 2001 Mazda 6. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1118 kg more than 2001 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda 6. (165 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 2001 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-350 | 6 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
Body Type | Van | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 165 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.1 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 64 L |