2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2001 Oldsmobile Aurora
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Oldsmobile Aurora. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Oldsmobile Aurora would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2001 Oldsmobile Aurora. (251 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2001 Oldsmobile Aurora. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 848 kg more than 2001 Oldsmobile Aurora. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Oldsmobile Aurora. (353 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Oldsmobile Aurora.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 2001 Oldsmobile Aurora | |
Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
Model | E-350 | Aurora |
Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 3473 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 353 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 5070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 70 L |