2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2002 Audi A6
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi A6 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2002 Audi A6. (247 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2002 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 672 kg more than 2002 Audi A6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Audi A6. (350 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 2002 Audi A6 | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | E-350 | A6 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | Van | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 350 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2422 kg | 1750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 70 L |