2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2002 Mahindra Commander
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mahindra Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mahindra Commander would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra Commander. (62 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1118 kg more than 2002 Mahindra Commander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 352 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mahindra Commander. (123 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mahindra Commander.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-350 | 2002 Mahindra Commander | |
| Make | Ford | Mahindra |
| Model | E-350 | Commander |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2112 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 475 Nm | 123 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 1370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2690 mm |
