2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP) has 185 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1748 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 373 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Ford | MCC |
Model | E-350 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 475 Nm | 102 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 1810 mm |