2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2003 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2003 Ford Falcon. (220 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 973 kg more than 2003 Ford Falcon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Falcon. (357 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 2003 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | E-350 | Falcon |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 357 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.1 mm | 92.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 99.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 59 L |