2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Smart would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1668 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 363 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (112 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-350 | 2003 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Ford | MCC |
| Model | E-350 | Smart |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 475 Nm | 112 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 3440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2370 mm |
