2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 6,749 cc (12 cylinders), 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom (454 HP @ 5350 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-350. (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 63 kg more than 2004 Ford E-350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom (721 Nm) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford E-350. (475 Nm). This means 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-350 | 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | E-350 | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Van | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 6749 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 454 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5350 RPM |
| Torque | 475 Nm | 721 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2422 kg | 2485 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 6090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 100 L |
