2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (108 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1383 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 327 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (148 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | E-350 | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 148 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.1 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 50 L |