2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2005 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2005 Volvo XC90 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2005 Volvo XC90. (208 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2005 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 393 kg more than 2005 Volvo XC90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volvo XC90. (340 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 2005 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | E-350 | XC90 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 340 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 2095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 72 L |