2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (104 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 368 kg more than 2004 Ford E-350.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (174 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | E-350 | Ranger |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | Van | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 174 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 2856 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2990 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 80 L |