2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2006 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2006 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2006 Jeep Wrangler. (175 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2006 Jeep Wrangler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 624 kg more than 2006 Jeep Wrangler. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Jeep Wrangler. (297 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 2006 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | E-350 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 297 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.1 mm | 98.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 86.7 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 1864 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 72 L |