2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1313 kg more than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (294 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | E-350 | Colt |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2835 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 294 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.1 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 21.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 95 L |