2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (215 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 253 kg more than 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee (510 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford E-350. (475 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | E-350 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 510 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2422 kg | 2169 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2160 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 78 L |