2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (169 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 938 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (228 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-350 | 6 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2486 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 228 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.1 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 64 L |