2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2010 Acura CSX
To start off, 2010 Acura CSX is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP) has 58 more horse power than 2010 Acura CSX. (197 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2010 Acura CSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1175 kg more than 2010 Acura CSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 2010 Acura CSX | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | E-350 | CSX |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 197 HP |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2700 mm |