2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Suburban (320 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-350. (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 121 kg more than 2004 Ford E-350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chevrolet Suburban. (454 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chevrolet Suburban.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 2010 Chevrolet Suburban | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | E-350 | Suburban |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 320 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 454 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2422 kg | 2543 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5649 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1951 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3302 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 117 L |