2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2010 Citroen C3
To start off, 2010 Citroen C3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C3. (108 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1236 kg more than 2010 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 328 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Citroen C3. (147 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 2010 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Ford | Citroen |
Model | E-350 | C3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 147 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.1 mm | 78.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 1252 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 47 L |