2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2010 Koenigsegg CCX
To start off, 2010 Koenigsegg CCX is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Koenigsegg CCX (806 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 551 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-350. (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Koenigsegg CCX should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1308 kg more than 2010 Koenigsegg CCX.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Koenigsegg CCX (919 Nm) has 444 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford E-350. (475 Nm). This means 2010 Koenigsegg CCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 2010 Koenigsegg CCX | |
Make | Ford | Koenigsegg |
Model | E-350 | CCX |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 4719 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 806 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 919 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2660 mm |