2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP) has 101 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C-Crosser.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Citroen C-Crosser. (380 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Citroen C-Crosser.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-350 | 2012 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Ford | Citroen |
| Model | E-350 | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Van | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 475 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
