2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz R
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2012 Mercedes-Benz R. (187 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2012 Mercedes-Benz R.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mercedes-Benz R. (440 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mercedes-Benz R.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-350 | 2012 Mercedes-Benz R | |
| Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | E-350 | R |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Van | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 475 Nm | 440 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5156 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1958 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1661 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3216 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 80 L |
