2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2012 Renault Logan
To start off, 2012 Renault Logan is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 2012 Renault Logan. (86 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Logan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1252 kg more than 2012 Renault Logan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 347 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Logan. (128 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Logan.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 2012 Renault Logan | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | E-350 | Logan |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 128 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2422 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 50 L |