2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-350. (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 565 kg more than 2013 Cadillac CTS.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (373 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-350 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Ford | Cadillac |
| Model | E-350 | CTS |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Van | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 314 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 475 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.7 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2422 kg | 1857 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4877 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 68 L |
