2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2013 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2013 Nissan Juke is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2013 Nissan Juke. (185 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2013 Nissan Juke. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 981 kg more than 2013 Nissan Juke. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Nissan Juke. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Nissan Juke.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 2013 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | E-350 | Juke |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Van | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 240 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2422 kg | 1441 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 45 L |