2004 Ford Econoline vs. 1960 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2004 Ford Econoline is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Econoline | 1960 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Econoline | Cedric |
Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2540 mm |