2004 Ford Econoline vs. 1967 TVR Tuscan
To start off, 2004 Ford Econoline is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 TVR Tuscan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 TVR Tuscan would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 TVR Tuscan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 TVR Tuscan (229 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2004 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 TVR Tuscan should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1460 kg more than 1967 TVR Tuscan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Econoline | 1967 TVR Tuscan | |
Make | Ford | TVR |
Model | Econoline | Tuscan |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4727 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 229 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2290 mm |