2004 Ford Econoline vs. 1972 Ford GT 40
To start off, 2004 Ford Econoline is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford GT 40 would be higher. Both 2004 Ford Econoline and 1972 Ford GT 40 are equipped with a 4,195 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 2004 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1365 kg more than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Econoline (338 Nm) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Econoline | 1972 Ford GT 40 | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Econoline | GT 40 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2420 mm |
