2004 Ford Econoline vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Starion
To start off, 2004 Ford Econoline is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Starion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Starion would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Econoline (197 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Starion. (145 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Starion.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Econoline (338 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Starion. (251 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Starion.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Econoline | 1982 Mitsubishi Starion | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Econoline | Starion |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 145 HP |
Torque | 338 Nm | 251 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |