2004 Ford Econoline vs. 1982 Opel Kadett
To start off, 2004 Ford Econoline is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Kadett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Kadett would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1540 kg more than 1982 Opel Kadett.
Because 2004 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Opel Kadett, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Econoline | 1982 Opel Kadett | |
| Make | Ford | Opel |
| Model | Econoline | Kadett |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 785 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2520 mm |
