2004 Ford Econoline vs. 1989 Jaguar XJS
To start off, 2004 Ford Econoline is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Jaguar XJS (235 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2004 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econoline weights approximately 575 kg more than 1989 Jaguar XJS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Jaguar XJS (387 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1989 Jaguar XJS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Econoline | 1989 Jaguar XJS | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Econoline | XJS |
Year Released | 2004 | 1989 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 387 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2600 mm |