2004 Ford Econoline vs. 1992 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2004 Ford Econoline is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda RX-7 (239 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2004 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1025 kg more than 1992 Mazda RX-7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda RX-7. (296 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Econoline | 1992 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Econoline | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Body Type | Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 239 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 296 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2440 mm |