2004 Ford Econoline vs. 1997 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2004 Ford Econoline is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2004 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Econoline.
Because 2004 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Oldsmobile SS. (318 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Oldsmobile SS.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Econoline | 1997 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
Model | Econoline | SS |
Year Released | 2004 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 318 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1900 mm |