2004 Ford Econoline vs. 1999 Lotus GT 1
To start off, 2004 Ford Econoline is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Lotus GT 1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Lotus GT 1 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lotus GT 1 (573 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 376 more horse power than 2004 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lotus GT 1 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1275 kg more than 1999 Lotus GT 1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lotus GT 1 (390 Nm @ 6500 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1999 Lotus GT 1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Econoline | 1999 Lotus GT 1 | |
| Make | Ford | Lotus |
| Model | Econoline | GT 1 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3504 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 573 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 390 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2080 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2690 mm |
