2004 Ford Econoline vs. 2002 BMW Z3
To start off, 2004 Ford Econoline is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW Z3 (228 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2004 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econoline weights approximately 925 kg more than 2002 BMW Z3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW Z3. (301 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Econoline | 2002 BMW Z3 | |
Make | Ford | BMW |
Model | Econoline | Z3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 301 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2450 mm |