2004 Ford Econoline vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2004 Ford Econoline is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2004 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Econoline (338 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Econoline | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Econoline | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2380 mm |