2004 Ford Econoline vs. 2003 Mahindra Bolero
To start off, 2004 Ford Econoline is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mahindra Bolero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mahindra Bolero would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2003 Mahindra Bolero. (72 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2003 Mahindra Bolero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econoline weights approximately 630 kg more than 2003 Mahindra Bolero. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mahindra Bolero. (156 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mahindra Bolero.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Econoline | 2003 Mahindra Bolero | |
Make | Ford | Mahindra |
Model | Econoline | Bolero |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1695 kg |