2004 Ford Econoline vs. 2004 Mazda B4000
To start off, both 2004 Ford Econoline and 2004 Mazda B4000 were released in the same year (2004). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda B4000 (207 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2004 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B4000 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econoline weights approximately 658 kg more than 2004 Mazda B4000.
Because 2004 Mazda B4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Econoline (338 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B4000. (323 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Econoline | 2004 Mazda B4000 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Econoline | B4000 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Van | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4031 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 323 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1667 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3200 mm |
