2004 Ford Econoline vs. 2008 Kia Cerato
To start off, 2008 Kia Cerato is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1001 kg more than 2008 Kia Cerato.
Because 2004 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Kia Cerato, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Kia Cerato. (146 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Kia Cerato.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Econoline | 2008 Kia Cerato | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Econoline | Cerato |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1324 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2620 mm |