2004 Ford Econoline vs. 2009 Renault Trafic
To start off, 2009 Renault Trafic is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 2009 Renault Trafic. (100 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Trafic.
Because 2004 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Trafic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Trafic. (241 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Trafic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Econoline | 2009 Renault Trafic | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Econoline | Trafic |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Van | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 241 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3100 mm |