2004 Ford Econoline vs. 2011 Saab 05-Sep
To start off, 2011 Saab 05-Sep is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Saab 05-Sep (300 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2004 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Saab 05-Sep should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Econoline.
Because 2011 Saab 05-Sep is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Saab 05-Sep will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Saab 05-Sep (400 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2011 Saab 05-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Econoline | 2011 Saab 05-Sep | |
| Make | Ford | Saab |
| Model | Econoline | 05-Sep |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Van | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5009 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1862 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1468 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2837 mm |
