2004 Ford Econoline vs. 2012 Renault Wind
To start off, 2012 Renault Wind is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1119 kg more than 2012 Renault Wind.
Because 2004 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Wind, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Econoline | 2012 Renault Wind | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Econoline | Wind |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1206 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3822 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1698 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1415 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2368 mm |