2004 Ford Econovan vs. 1951 GAZ M-20
To start off, 2004 Ford Econovan is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Econovan (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1951 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 1951 GAZ M-20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 GAZ M-20 weights approximately 164 kg more than 2004 Ford Econovan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Econovan (138 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Econovan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Econovan | 1951 GAZ M-20 | |
Make | Ford | GAZ |
Model | Econovan | M-20 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1951 |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 2120 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2710 mm |