2004 Ford Econovan vs. 1951 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2004 Ford Econovan is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,953 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Maserati A6G (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2004 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econovan weights approximately 196 kg more than 1951 Maserati A6G.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Econovan | 1951 Maserati A6G | |
| Make | Ford | Maserati |
| Model | Econovan | A6G |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1789 cc | 1953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1100 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2560 mm |
