2004 Ford Econovan vs. 1954 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2004 Ford Econovan is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Talbot T 26 (198 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2004 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 314 kg more than 2004 Ford Econovan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Econovan | 1954 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | Ford | Talbot |
| Model | Econovan | T 26 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 1789 cc | 4482 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 198 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1890 mm |
