2004 Ford Econovan vs. 1959 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 2004 Ford Econovan is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,153 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Econovan (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1959 Jeep CJ5. (62 HP @ 3000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 1959 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econovan weights approximately 116 kg more than 1959 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Econovan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Jeep CJ5 (180 Nm @ 1350 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Econovan. (138 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1959 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Econovan | 1959 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Econovan | CJ5 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1959 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 3153 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1350 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2060 mm |